While reaffirming its commitment to the National Economic Development and Labour Council (Nedlac), organised business has again questioned whether the structure’s current composition and functioning are “fit for purpose”.

Delivering the business constituency’s report at this year’s summit, which also marked Nedlac’s thirtieth anniversary, outgoing Business Unity South Africa CEO Cas Coovadia highlighted key areas of priority for business, including rethinking the country’s economic growth strategy, accelerating infrastructure development and reconfiguring government to enhance delivery.

Business also wanted the social partners to acknowledge crises and act immediately, and expressed frustration that problems at the Unemployment Insurance Fund and Compensation Fund had been allowed to fester.

“We, with social partners, have consistently raised concerns about the chaotic situation with the Unemployment Insurance Fund, including poor administration, weak governance and corruption.

“This falls squarely with the Department of Employment and Labour, and we expect substantive progress towards resolving this,” he said.

However, Coovadia also posed five questions that business felt should be answered for Nedlac’s future relevance to be ensured, including:

• how Nedlac’s fit-for-purpose role should be crystallised in the evolving socioeconomic environment;
• whether Nedlac was most effective when it sought to reach consensus on policy details, or rather when bringing social partners closer together on broad strategy and direction;
• whether different options for social compacts should be encouraged, including bilateral, multilateral and issue-based compacts, while highlighting the success of the collaboration under way between government and business on electricity, freight logistics and crime, as opposed to the prolonged and unsuccessful effort to agree on a “broad national social compact”;
• whether Nedlac should be an implementing body, or whether it should enable implementation of broad agreements through government and bilateral processes; and
• whether Nedlac was representative enough.

He highlighted that the economic environment and the world of work had changed significantly since the formation of Nedlac as the official platform where labour, government, community and business met to consider labour-market and socioeconomic policy and legislation and that it, thus, needed to adapt to remain “relevant and respected”.

Congress of South African Trade Unions general secretary Solly Phetoe, by contrast, highlighted the role that Nedlac had played in recent years in facilitating consensus on how to tackle serious problems such as loadshedding.

“Many critics have questioned the relevance of Nedlac, yet it is here that the Eskom social compact was finalised, giving momentum to the debt-relief package that today is helping Eskom to shift its focus to maintenance and ending loadshedding,” Phetoe said.

Nedlac executive director Lisa Seftel, meanwhile, urged both “continuity and change”, arguing that Nedlac should continue to provide an inclusive platform for dialogue on socioeconomic policies and Bills and labour-market reform.

It also needed to find a way for proactive collaboration on priority areas, as well as areas of threat, such as climate change.